Notting Hill Genesis commissioned an independent survey company (The Leadership Factor) to carry out our Tenant Perception Survey in 4 phases during the 2025-2026 financial year. We gathered 3581 survey responses in total, and all have been included in the results. As well as publishing our results from all residents, we’ll break this down into two key groups called ‘low cost renters’ and ‘low cost home owners’.

Low cost renters is a term used by the Regulator of Social Housing to mean general needs, supported, intermediate rent and temporary social housing. Low cost home owners are shared owners who have not fully staircased. As part of the survey, we interviews 2576 tenants and 2468 were completed in full. From the low cost homeowners group there were 601 interviews and 585 surveys completed in full.

Before the TSMs framework was introduced, we were already doing an annual survey of our residents, so to ensure we’re still hearing from residents in all tenures we’ve extended the TSM survey beyond the low cost renter and low cost home owners groups to include a sample of residents across all tenures.

We’re pleased that during this third year of the TSMs survey we managed to hear from a broad range of residents about their experiences with NHG. The majority of surveys were carried out as phone interviews. Some surveys were done by postal survey to ensure we gave as many different residents as possible the chance to take part. The postal survey specifically targeted residents living in our agency managed supported accommodation and as well as our co-op managed residents. A full table showing the number of responses for each survey method is available here.

The survey company surveyed a random sample of all our residents and ensured this was a representative sample by looking at characteristics like age and ethnicity as well as tenure type and where people live. For example, we ensured that the number of responses reflected the number of residents we have in different age groups, living in different regions, residents of different ethnicities or living in different types of accommodation, such as permanent rented or housing with care and support. Full details of the characteristics we used to ensure the sample was representative is available for both 
 low cost renter and low cost home owner results.

Terms explained

Low cost renters Low cost home owners Other tenures
  • General needs
    (social rent)
  • Supported housing
  • Sheltered housing
  • Intermediate market rent
  • Temporary housing
    (owned)
  • Key worker
  • London Living Rent
  • Shared owners
    (in properties which have not been fully staircased)
  • Leasehold
  • SimpliCity
  • Temporary housing
    (not owned, managed)
  • Folio
    (market rent)

Responses by survey method

This table shows how the responses break down by collection method:

  Telephone Post
Low cost renters 2514 62
Low cost home owners 601 0

Summary of representativeness - Low cost renters

Tenant perception measures Relevant tenant population (% total) Total survey responses (% total)
Housing category    

Housing

88.7

87.9

KEY WORKER

2.8

2.6

LONDON LIVING RENT

0.9

0.9

Supported

7.3

8.1

Temporary Housing

0.3

0.3

Home ownership

0.1

0.2

Ethnicity    

Asian or Asian British

9.6

9.4

Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African

25.5

26.9

Mixed or multiple ethnic groups

5.1

4.5

Other ethnic group

6.5

6.2

Unknown

17.7

15.3

White

35.6

37.7

Region    

EAST TEAM REGION

26.6

26.8

WEST TEAM REGION

22.7

24.0

NORTH TEAM REGION

21.6

21.1

CENTRAL TEAM REGION

21.1

19.2

OUT OF LONDON

7.1

7.2

UNKNOWN

0.9

1.6

Age    

25 and Under

1.7

1.8

26-35

10.0

10.1

36-45

17.9

17.7

46-55

21.2

21.0

56-65

25.5

24.5

66-75

14.2

13.8

Over 75

8.9

8.3

Unknown

0.5

2.8

Summary of representativeness - Low cost home owners

Tenant perception measures Relevant tenant population (% total) Total survey responses (% total)
Housing category    
Home Ownership

94.6

94.7

Housing

0.4

0.5

Supported

5.0

4.8

Ethnicity    
Asian or Asian British

3.9

3.1

Black,  Black British, Caribbean or African

4.3

4.8

Mixed or multiple ethnic groups

1.5

0.7

Other ethnic group

1.2

0.6

Unknown

67.8

64.9

White

21.3

25.9

Age    
25 and under

0.4

0.5

26-35

12.4

13.1

36-45

26.9

27.3

46-55

24.2

23.8

56-65

17.6

16.8

66-75

8.0

7.3

Over 75

5.1

5.2

Unknown

5.4

6.0

Rationale for the choice of characteristics

The categories shown in the table above were selected to ensure that we have a balance of representation across characteristics which we know to be typically relevant to our resident satisfaction - that is, housing category, ethnicity, region, and age. For instance, we know residents in our supported housing category typically score more highly on satisfaction overall, so it was important to ensure the sample of responses for that group was proportionate to that population size. We also know that the housing category is relevant to the way in which we provide our service, and those differences in how we deliver our service are likely to influence tenants perception. As with previous years, ‘region’ was not relevant to low cost home owners as we did not categorise the stock in this way, so this was not included as a characteristic for this group. We also took into consideration the regulators’ guidance on characteristics, the approach used by our peers for this purpose and which data we had available to be able to segment the resident population.